W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2008

Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:41:00 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uhc3umoe64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:27:33 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> HTML5, as currently drafted, already allows URIs in link/@rel to the  
>>> same extent @xmlns takes a URI. That is, using a URI as a rel token is  
>>> allowed (if the extension designer registers it on the wiki), but the  
>>> token is compared as a string--not as a URI.
>>  Also, note that such tokens (e.g. stylesheet) are compared in an ASCII  
>> case-insensitive manner.
>
> ...where does it say that?

HTML5 does not say so currently, but that's a bug. HTML4 has said that for  
over a decade though:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#adef-rel


> And what does that imply for the comparison of relation names that  
> contain non-ASCII characters?

That &eacute; and &Eacute; are different?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 09:41:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:06 GMT