W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2008

Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:22:06 +0200
Message-ID: <48C96FDE.7030606@gmx.de>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> ...
> HTTP Link: it's a URI reference, and in RDFa, (I assume, I haven't
> looked closely) it's a CURIE.
> ...

But RDFa talks about link/@rel, which RDFa doesn't own. If HTML5 later 
on decides to allow URIs in link/@rel (and I think I've seen several 
proposals that go into that direction), then we have another conflict 
between the RFDa community and the WHATWG crowd.

This one could be easily avoided by requiring a safe CURIE.

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 19:22:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:06 GMT