Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

Dan Connolly wrote:
> ...
> HTTP Link: it's a URI reference, and in RDFa, (I assume, I haven't
> looked closely) it's a CURIE.
> ...

But RDFa talks about link/@rel, which RDFa doesn't own. If HTML5 later 
on decides to allow URIs in link/@rel (and I think I've seen several 
proposals that go into that direction), then we have another conflict 
between the RFDa community and the WHATWG crowd.

This one could be easily avoided by requiring a safe CURIE.

BR, Julian