Re: [XRI] XRI-as-Relative-URI proposal

Good - thanks for the pointer to the blog post, and I acknowledge that I
misread [1].

Yes, let's try to coordinate on uniform access to resource descriptions. I
would like to see something like Link: adopted (that means used, not just
specified) for locating RDF-encoded resource descriptions (or metadata; I'm
not happy with any name that's been applied to these beasts). The approach
should be similar.

[1] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri

Jonathan

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:51 AM, John Bradley <jbradley@wingaa.com> wrote:

> Hi Stuart,
> I did a blog post on how XRI relate to cool URI at
> http://thread-safe.livejournal.com/14165.html.
>
> I am traveling at the moment and will get to some direct comments on the
> weekend.
>
> We are exploring Link headers as part of our work on XRDS-Simple.  We
> intend to move in that direction for our http: and https: bindings.   We are
> in contact with Mark Nottingham on the topic.
>
> Given the current non-standard status of link headers we want
> to coordinate with other efforts before we make specific proposals on how
> XRI  will use them in the http: sub scheme.
>
> I will post a copy of my blog post to the email list for the record.
>
> Regards
> John Bradley
> http://xri.net/=jbradley
>