W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2008

RE: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 13:45:06 +0000
To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <9674EA156DA93A4F855379AABDA4A5C611D1DCAB3B@G5W0277.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Hmmm... now looked and found http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/zip

No frag id semantics... maybe an update would be in order.

Stuart
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
> Sent: 23 May 2008 12:28
> To: Dan Brickley; Marcos Caceres
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org; WAF WG (public); Jon Ferraiolo
> Subject: RE: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme
>
>
> I was thinking that a media type/content type for .zip (like)
> files with a definitions such that fragIds can be used to
> refer to the items within the file - admittedly doesn't nest
> to well items within a zipped item in a zip file. Haven't
> checked to see if such a media type exists or has been
> attempted in the past, but it seems to me more appropriate
> than a URI scheme.
>
> BR
>
> Stuart
> --
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road,
> Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> > On Behalf Of Dan Brickley
> > Sent: 23 May 2008 12:08
> > To: Marcos Caceres
> > Cc: www-tag@w3.org; WAF WG (public); Jon Ferraiolo
> > Subject: Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme
> >
> >
> > Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > > Dear TAG,
> > > The WAF working group is seeking advice on the creation
> of a Widget
> > > URI scheme.
> >
> > If you really can't live with http: URIs, have you considered
> > using the
> > tag: URI scheme, see http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc4151.html
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Dan
>
>
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 13:50:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:57 GMT