On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > On 2008-06-17 16:14:20 +1000, Marcos Caceres wrote: > >> Irrespective of encoding issues, the premise remains that the HTTP >> protocol is not suitable for widgets and hence we need "widgets://" > > You mean that the http URI scheme is not suitable for widgets. Yes. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au http://standardssuck.orgReceived on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 22:23:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:58 GMT