W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Using http: for naming not so obvious

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:47:05 +0900
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D1D45447-5B2A-4605-A834-0E8A481B2936@w3.org>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>


this

Le 13 juin 2008 à 04:42, Jonathan Rees a écrit :
> They think (a) that their naming system if http-based would  
> catastrophically fail if DNS failed in one of these ways, and (b)  
> that they can set up a naming system that is more abstract and  
> timeless than is http: so that DNS risks are avoided.

and this

> Scientists in particular are anti-authority, and naturally gravitate  
> to systems like LSID that eliminate any reference to anything they  
> don't control.

makes me think of the (evil?) idea of using RFC2606 [1]

                    .test
                 .example
                 .invalid
               .localhost
and
         example.com
         example.net
         example.org

[1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606#section-2

-- 
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 01:47:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:58 GMT