Re: Using http: for naming not so obvious

this

Le 13 juin 2008 à 04:42, Jonathan Rees a écrit :
> They think (a) that their naming system if http-based would  
> catastrophically fail if DNS failed in one of these ways, and (b)  
> that they can set up a naming system that is more abstract and  
> timeless than is http: so that DNS risks are avoided.

and this

> Scientists in particular are anti-authority, and naturally gravitate  
> to systems like LSID that eliminate any reference to anything they  
> don't control.

makes me think of the (evil?) idea of using RFC2606 [1]

                    .test
                 .example
                 .invalid
               .localhost
and
         example.com
         example.net
         example.org

[1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606#section-2

-- 
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool