this Le 13 juin 2008 à 04:42, Jonathan Rees a écrit : > They think (a) that their naming system if http-based would > catastrophically fail if DNS failed in one of these ways, and (b) > that they can set up a naming system that is more abstract and > timeless than is http: so that DNS risks are avoided. and this > Scientists in particular are anti-authority, and naturally gravitate > to systems like LSID that eliminate any reference to anything they > don't control. makes me think of the (evil?) idea of using RFC2606 [1] .test .example .invalid .localhost and example.com example.net example.org [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606#section-2 -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be CoolReceived on Friday, 13 June 2008 01:47:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:57 UTC