W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [httpRedirections-57] Resource-Decription Header: a possible proposal to consider.

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:57:52 -0500
Message-ID: <e9dffd640802060557r118125bet39e5c4eee8de7507@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>, "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>

On 2/6/08, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com> wrote:
> The Idea:
> ---------
> <quote>
> I generally agree. "Site" is one type of resource, perhaps its special
> enough to get its own HTTP header (?) but why not just (example HTTP
> response headers):
>
> Resource-Type: http://example.org/siteOntology#Site
> Resource-Description: http://example.org/site.rdf
>
> would solve this problem, as well as [httpRange-14] in a general fashion.
> </quote>

FWIW, Resource-Type was specified here;

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Mar/att-0054/draft-palmer-resrep-type-00.txt

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 13:58:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:52 GMT