Re: [httpRedirections-57] Resource-Decription Header: a possible proposal to consider.

On 2/6/08, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com> wrote:
> The Idea:
> ---------
> <quote>
> I generally agree. "Site" is one type of resource, perhaps its special
> enough to get its own HTTP header (?) but why not just (example HTTP
> response headers):
>
> Resource-Type: http://example.org/siteOntology#Site
> Resource-Description: http://example.org/site.rdf
>
> would solve this problem, as well as [httpRange-14] in a general fashion.
> </quote>

FWIW, Resource-Type was specified here;

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Mar/att-0054/draft-palmer-resrep-type-00.txt

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com