Re: Question about the On Linking Alternative Representations TAG Finding

* On 2008/08/11 04:18 PM -0400, I wrote:
> Several thoughts.

... which I've ellided here.

Richard, all, I need to check -- was what I said clear?

Did it resolve the points of contention and confusion?

Are we now in agreement as to how alternative representations and
resources are interrelated, and how con-neg is supposed to work?

Can we now take that agreement and resolution back to LOD and the other
discussion arenas where confusion remains?

I think reference back to the www-tag thread archive, along with a brief
summary (can we agree that the bullet points of my last post are a good
summary?), would be good to share in those other spaces.

If points of confusion or disagreement remain, the conversation should
probably continue ... but I hope that is not necessary at this point.

Be seeing you,

Ted



-- 
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers