- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:18:15 -0600
- To: wangxiao@musc.edu
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Michaeljohn Clement <mj@mjclement.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
Xiaoshu Wang wrote: > > Because you know that I oppose the notion of IR and have a > /misunderstood/ or broader sense of "awww:resource", then I don't > know why you said: "In such a case, your variant representations are > not awww:resources or even Information Resources ..." Not in such a > case, in all my cases, it is like that. > Ah. Sorry, I meant no offense... but I also read a post of yours which said you aren't the type to take offense, or somesuch... ;-) But seriously, I was attempting to help you understand what awww:resource and IR *are* by showing you what they *aren't*. I realize this isn't exactly the concrete definition you are seeking, but I thought it might help. -Eric
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 01:20:39 UTC