On Apr 13, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Michaeljohn Clement wrote: > But you are wrong, there is no such thing as a byte-copy of an > information resource (in the AWWW sense). Obviously a clear > definition of what an IR is has been hard to come by, but it is > not something of which one can take a byte-copy. Any such thing > would be an awww:representation. Like anything at all, a awww:representation is a resource. One might argue, to make what you say true, that an awww:representation is not an IR, but I think that this would be difficult to support with the current definitions. -AlanReceived on Sunday, 13 April 2008 22:40:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:20 GMT