- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:45:22 +0200
- To: wangxiao@musc.edu
- CC: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "Michael K. Bergman" <mike@mkbergman.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Xiaoshu Wang wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Xiaoshu Wang wrote: >>>> Not really. The site owner (who may be != Joe) could configure the >>>> server to return a Link header, without having to touch the resource >>>> itself. >>> Julian, think more. If there is no new information, what would the >>> site owner configures it for? If there is new information, configure >>> Conneg (Accept) takes the same effort to configure LINK. >> >> Well, I gave an example (associating a CSS stylesheet with legacy HTML). > Bind the CSS stylesheet and HTML to the same URI. Given the stylesheet a > MIME type? Why would I ever want that? Is the content and the stylesheet the same resource? No. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2008 21:46:02 UTC