- From: Mikael Nilsson <mikael@nilsson.name>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:44:28 +0200
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hi! fre 2007-10-05 klockan 13:05 +0100 skrev Henry S. Thompson: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Norm Walsh and I have produced a new draft [1], responding to problems > some commentators had with the proposed RDF model. Comments welcome. I am confused by reading this document [1] and the HttpRange-14 proposal at [2] together. The two documents, while not in direct conflict, still seem to propose two completely different approaches. And together, they don't give any good guidance at all. Suppose I produce a namespace, i.e. a set of names, for a controlled vocabulary of, say, chemical compounds, and I want to identify them using the URIs http://chem.example.org/compounds#H2O etc. I then read [2], and set up a content neg URI at http://chem.example.org/compounds, the namespace URI, that gives RDF and HTML versions. Then I read [1], and suddenly I wonder if I've done the right thing or not. The document does not even reference content negotiation other than in a very small passage in section 4, and even then only refers to "RDDL 1.0, RDF through GRDDL, etc.". On the other hand, I know I'm creating a namespace, but still [2] does not mention "namespace" even once, and certainly does not mention how RDDL would fit into the picture. Please consider the interaction between these documents. They are currently way too confusing when taken together. Maybe the above has already been addressed elsewhere. If so, please ignore the above :-) /Mikael [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-08-31/HttpRange-14.html > > ht > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/ > - -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh > Half-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFHBiidkjnJixAXWBoRAlm/AJ9NdzccjfKsAubMVblv1ThKd2MIowCeMq0x > wV7191Vn12sry7qEsCFFzq4= > =yYBE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- <mikael@nilsson.name> Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 14:44:43 UTC