Re: New draft finding on issue namespaceDocument-8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mikael Nilsson writes:

> Please consider the interaction between these documents [1] [2]. They are
> currently way too confusing when taken together.
>
> Maybe the above has already been addressed elsewhere. If so, please
> ignore the above :-)

No, this hasn't been satisfactorily addressed elsewhere -- that's one
of the reasons they are both still drafts.  The EdNote in the Preface:

  "The TAG has not reached consensus on exactly what the right way to
   describe the URIs and resources involved and their relationships."

is meant to acknowledge this fact.

What do _you_ think is the right story here?

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHBlHikjnJixAXWBoRAqErAJ0fODG8wYGgOg4Up1M0AU5U3YNqrACfdLhW
psUYFwXGPhwWbx0okRO6lqI=
=eEUK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 15:02:07 UTC