On 30 Nov 2007, at 16:58, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > We could play this game across many more emails, but my case is > watertight. No need to continue the discussion then, I suppose. > P.S. Note that purl.org support 302 but not 303; and that they're a > popular choice for publishing Semantic Web ontologies. Do you think > they should have to support 303? Yes, if they want to cater to the needs of SemWeb publishers who for some reason choose not to use hash URIs. > What if they never do? What if they are already working on it? Richard > > > -- > Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/ >Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 17:37:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:18 GMT