On Nov 30, 2007 5:37 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Yes, if they want to cater to the needs of SemWeb publishers who > for some reason choose not to use hash URIs. Why's that? Didn't we just ascertain that they may use 302 also? -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 17:58:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:18 GMT