W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Moving xmlFunctions-34 forward

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:16:22 +0100
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bodj9cs09.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dan Connolly writes:

> Yes... hmm... I think one pressing case is the question of
> whether XInclude or XPath goes first. Murray Maloney
> gave a good example with disclaimers a while back...

I assume you mean XSLT, not XPath.

> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Nov/0127.html
>
> I'm not sure how well that example fits...

Just fine -- for better or worse, the draft finding calls out as an
unsolved issue how to deal with the ordering of elaboration signals
which are attributes.

>> Second, even supposing the worst case, in some sense, all this means
>> is that almost every application will start from the elaborated
>> infoset treating its _own_ namespace as a quoting signal.
>
> I think I lost you at "every application"; there's 1 main
> application we're trying to specify, no? i.e The Web.

I guess what I meant was that there has to be some way of establishing
who is asking the question "What is the elaborated infoset of this
document?".  If a specific concrete application is asking the
question, it will specify the quoting namespace(s).  If the document
is just found lying in the road, so to speak, then I guess its
document element namespace will have to be consulted (how?). . .

ht

[sorry for delay, this message languished half-finished at the bottom
of a virtual pile of paper]
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGeog3kjnJixAXWBoRAsldAJ49ik1YW7VuLDCkS7Cy8VsRWCnyDQCfSGDk
5CItNBMCiVUFtsBvV/AlDtM=
=W48T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 14:16:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:52 UTC