Frank Manola wrote: > On Jul 26, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Michael K. Bergman wrote: > >> Chris Bizer wrote: >>> Hi Frank, Pat and Bernard, >>> thanks a lot for all your ideas and comments. >>> So what we are having on the table right now is a definition: >>> "The term XXX refers to the description of a non-information resource >>> that a client obtains by dereferencing a specific URI that identifies >>> this non-information resource." >> >> Stand back and read this sentence to yourself three times. >> >>> and various proposals for the term: >>> Pat Hayes: >>> - represented description >>> - redirected description >>> - redescription >>> - transmit >>> - infon >>> Frank Manola >>> - associated representation >>> Bernard Vatant: >>> - description >> >> Can't we just kill the term "non-information resource" once and for >> all? All it does is obfuscate understanding and resolution. >> >> Mercy be upon us when we try to actually communicate with the public >> outside these forums. >> > > Why the qualification to "outside these forums"? Have you noticed how > much traffic the issue has generated *inside* these forums ever since > the distinction was made? +1 -- ______________________________ Michael K. Bergman Web Scientist 380 Knowling Drive Coralville, IA 52241 mailto:mike@mkbergman.com 319.339.0110 skype:michaelkbergman http://mkbergman.com ______________________________Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 16:25:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:53:11 GMT