- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 22:17:23 -0400
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Norm, Mostly these look fine, but I'd rather capture in a bit more detail the status of schemeProtocols: > Issue schemeProtocols-49 > > VQ: This is for Noah again. > > Noah: I don't think we ever agreed to publish anything on this topic What I said, or hope I said was more along the lines of: "Noah: although this still seems to me a very important issue, we've had real trouble converging on a story or on how to tell it (or maybe everyone else has converged and I as editor have been too dense to clearly capture that consensus.) Anyway, I think we agreed some time ago that I would give priority to working first on "Least Power" and then "Metadata in URI", putting down schemeProtocols at least for now. So, whether we eventually get back to schemeProtocols is an open question, but no progress is planned in the short- to medium-term." I think it's worth recording this detail, so when we look again in a few months we'll remember where we left it and why. Otherwise the minutes look really good. Thanks. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 02:17:47 UTC