On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:16 +0000, Misha Wolf wrote: > On 9 March, Dan wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:22 +0000, Misha Wolf wrote: > > > In seeking to formulate a proposal to the NewsML 2 Architecture > > > WP for how we should make use of RDDL and GRDDL, I am struck by > > > the different approaches taken by these two specs to linking to > > > resources. Presumably, there is no reason why not to use the > > > RDDL approach to link to GRDDL transforms (instead of the > > > approach proposed in the GRDDL spec). > > > > The approaches overlap; I've written RDDL documents that > > are also GRDDL documents. The GRDDL profile itself used > > to use RDDL; I found it hard to maintain, so I switched > > to Embedded RDF; perhaps I should go back in CVS-time, > > grab that RDDL example, and make an example of it... > > perhaps in the GRDDL test suite, perhaps elsewhere. > > > > Meanwhile, I'm interested to know... what differences > > looked important to you? > > I think that this is correct: > > - The RDDL architecture places the RDDL document at the namespace > location. This document specifies any number of links to typed > resources. > > - The GRDDL architecture provides a few hardwired locations for the > transforms. One of these locations is a specialised attribute in > the namespace document. > > These strike me as very different approaches. The former is open- > ended, the latter is not. Actually, the latter subsumes the former, so it is at least as open-ended, if not more. The few "hardwired" locations specified by GRDDL include the case of a RDDL-style namespace document. And as to "any number of links to typed resources", that's analagous to a bunch of RDF statements, which you can express in the GRDDL architecture, either directly as RDF/XML or using some other syntax via a transformation. I wonder if your concern is mostly about open-endedness of architectures or if there's something more specific. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 9 March 2006 17:26:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:10 GMT