W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2006

RE: G(RDDL)

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:16:16 +0000
To: www-tag@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Cc: newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
Message-id: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D8001523B73@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

On 9 March, Dan wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:22 +0000, Misha Wolf wrote:
> > In seeking to formulate a proposal to the NewsML 2 Architecture 
> > WP for how we should make use of RDDL and GRDDL, I am struck by 
> > the different approaches taken by these two specs to linking to 
> > resources.  Presumably, there is no reason why not to use the 
> > RDDL approach to link to GRDDL transforms (instead of the 
> > approach proposed in the GRDDL spec).
> 
> The approaches overlap; I've written RDDL documents that
> are also GRDDL documents. The GRDDL profile itself used
> to use RDDL; I found it hard to maintain, so I switched
> to Embedded RDF; perhaps I should go back in CVS-time,
> grab that RDDL example, and make an example of it...
> perhaps in the GRDDL test suite, perhaps elsewhere.
> 
> Meanwhile, I'm interested to know... what differences
> looked important to you?

I think that this is correct:

-  The RDDL architecture places the RDDL document at the namespace 
   location.  This document specifies any number of links to typed 
   resources.

-  The GRDDL architecture provides a few hardwired locations for the 
   transforms.  One of these locations is a specialised attribute in 
   the namespace document.

These strike me as very different approaches.  The former is open-
ended, the latter is not.

> >   If we were to do this, we would wish 
> > to use some agreed natures/purposes.  Is anyone interested in 
> > defining these?
> 
> I am, inasmuch as RDDL natures/purposes are just RDF properties.
> 
> p.s. I'm replying to all 3 lists, including 
> newsml-2@yahoogroups.com, hough the last few times I copied that 
> list, I got a notice that I'm not authorized to post there.

The newsml-2 list has the same spam-avoidance policy as the (set of)
public W3C lists, namely you need to be a member of the newsml-2
list in order to post to it*.  Anyone can go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2/
and click on the "Join" button.

* In the case of the W3C public lists, one needs to be a member of
at least one W3C list.

Misha

NewsML 2 resources:
http://www.iptc.org/        | http://www.iptc.org/NAR/
http://www.iptc.org/NAR/1.0 | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2/


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 16:16:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:39 GMT