- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:14:26 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Last week I said I was happy with
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/06/23-rddl/
and I mostly am, but since then it occurred to me that
the namespace document at http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
doesn't ground the term
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer
I'd like to see an HTML anchor a la id="integer" and
for the output from GRDDL to include the triple
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer> rdf:type
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Datatype>.
likewise #int and others per...
[[
Each built-in datatype in this specification (both ·primitive· and
·derived·) can be uniquely addressed via a URI Reference constructed as
follows:
1. the base URI is the URI of the XML Schema namespace
2. the fragment identifier is the name of the datatype
For example, to address the int datatype, the URI is:
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int
Additionally, each facet definition element can be uniquely addressed
via a URI constructed as follows:
1. the base URI is the URI of the XML Schema namespace
2. the fragment identifier is the name of the facet
For example, to address the maxInclusive facet, the URI is:
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#maxInclusive
Additionally, each facet usage in a built-in datatype definition can be
uniquely addressed via a URI constructed as follows:
1. the base URI is the URI of the XML Schema namespace
2. the fragment identifier is the name of the datatype, followed by
a period (".") followed by the name of the facet
For example, to address the usage of the maxInclusive facet in the
definition of int, the URI is:
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int.maxInclusive
]]
-- http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 17:14:36 UTC