Re: a fly-by of Compound Document (WICD) specs w.r.t. TAG issues

On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 19:56 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:48:25 +0100, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> >>> Re xlinkScope-23: What is the scope of using XLink?
> >>>
> >>> it seems that XLink is used for some, but not all links in WICD
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051121/#link-activation
> >>
> >> We are not using XLink, SVG is. ;-)
> >
> > If that's intended as any more than a joke, could you clarify?
> 
> The document you reference is the framework. It is intended not to be  
> language specific. (Section 2.3 needs some revision.)
> 
> WICD is about XHTML referencing SVG (mostly), but that does not mean we  
> are using XLink for links.

Well, to my reading, yes, it does mean that WICD uses Xlink for
some links.

I'd much rather leave people/groups aside and speak of
technologies, btw.

>  We are just reusing XHTML and SVG as they are  
> defined.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 19:03:41 UTC