Elliotte Harold wrote: > > The first paragraph in section 1 states that SQL is Turing complete. I > could be wrong about this, and it could depend on the dialect, but I > don't think SQL is Turing complete, at least not in its usual standard > incarnation. A quick Google search on "SQL Turing complete" turned up > these: It does depend on the dialect, some are Turing complete but the ANSI version isn't (or at least wasn't at one point).Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:29:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:09 GMT