- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:40:46 -0500
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
The first paragraph in section 1 states that SQL is Turing complete. I could be wrong about this, and it could depend on the dialect, but I don't think SQL is Turing complete, at least not in its usual standard incarnation. A quick Google search on "SQL Turing complete" turned up these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing-complete http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200207/msg00704.html -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:40:55 UTC