On Apr 15, 2005, at 12:51 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >> One thing I didn't get to do in time for this round was make it a >> proper RDDL document. There's some irony in that, to be sure, but I'm >> not sure what the nature and purpose URIs should be for function >> definitions anyway. > > (double-checking... http://www.rddl.org/#nature is like rdf:type > and each purpose is like an RDF property... ok...) > > I think a/the nature (i.e. rdf:type) of an XQuery function > is owl:FunctionalProperty. > > I can't think of any relevant uses of rddl:purpose. > Interesting ... it seems to me that the definition of a function is when one's nature and purpose are the same thing e.g. xquery:function where xquery:function rdfs:subClassOf owl:FunctionalProperty. JonathanReceived on Saturday, 16 April 2005 00:45:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:34 GMT