W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2005

RE: Andrew Layman and Don Box Analysis of XML Optimization Techni ques

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:13:58 -0500
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206D9C@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: 'Don Box' <dbox@microsoft.com>, "Rice, Ed (HP.com)" <ed.rice@hp.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
Cc: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>, Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>

HTTP needed no formal analysis nor test cases.  
HTML needed no formal analysis nor test cases.
SOAP needed no formal analysis nor test cases.
The proof was the use and the rapid deployment 
with the exception of the third item which is 
so far, unproven but the market is patient.

The FastInfoset approach has been privately benchmarked and proven 
to be workable in much the same way as the cases given above.  Since 
faster performance is a customer requirement and not a theoretical 
issue, customers can go to the innovators who provide the necessary
technology.

That would be, in this case, Sun.  They are of course, possibly willing 
to license that technology to their partner in Redmond which has 
slower and late to market technology to assist them in coming to market.

len
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 13:14:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:34 GMT