I pulled the Gruber reference from an article I wrote for the defunct MIT Markup Languages magazine. It referenced the following articles: [Gruber 1993] Gruber, Thomas. "Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used in Knowledge Sharing". http://ksl-web.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/onto-design.rtf [Gruber 1997] Gruber, Tom. "What is an Ontology?" http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Stuart Williams >I think of it in the traditional sense of "ontological >commitment" per Thomas Gruber. > >"An ontology should require the minimal ontological >commitment sufficient to support the intended knowledge >sharing activities... Since ontological commitment is based >on consistent use of vocabulary, ontological commitment can >be minimized by specifying the weakest theory (allowing >the most models) and defining only those terms which are >essential to the communication of knowledge consistent >with that theory." > > Cool... I should read some more of him.Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:12:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:04 GMT