On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 10:32, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote: [...] > 2. Continue review of comments. > New threads since last week: > + [19]section 2.2 - what does it mean to 'take on meaning > + [20]Use of "assign" for URI -> resource > + [21]Comments from the QA WG on WebArch 2nd LC > (extensibility) I'd also like to discuss the older threads that didn't get actions last week; esp. the comments from Dom * editorial [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch] * 2004-09-13T18:37:09Z from connolly * resources/representations [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch] * 2004-09-13T18:38:08Z from connolly * too positive on extensibility [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch] * 2004-09-13T18:39:18Z from connolly -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Monday, 20 September 2004 14:00:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:03 GMT