> Well, I've proposed "Web Resource", which is the subclass of Resources > which have web accessible representations. > > So, if for a given URI you GET a "200 OK" response, it is a "web = > resource". > > But what real utility does that provide the user? Why the need for any > name at all? Or why the need for a subclass of Resource? Sorry, I missed this amid the spam on my first pass through my mailbox. The utility is just based on the Ontaria UI design: resources are viewed through a particular presentation-rule appropriate to the class of the resource. Since resources are usually in multiple classes, they have multiple views, which the user can select on tabs. It's a little hard to explain; hopefully it'll be obvious if you play with it in the next release. - sandroReceived on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:09:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:55 GMT