- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 01:18:41 +0200
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 12:15:01 AM, Ian wrote: IBJ> [IanJ] TBL: If MJ is prepared to write something up, I'd suggest that IBJ> we review /DesignIssues/TLD for a sanity check. IBJ> * DanC_ hears an anybody/somebody/nobody request IBJ> [IanJ] DC: I'd prefer that TBL send /DesignIssues/TLD to www-tag. IBJ> [IanJ] TBL: Are we asking the TAG to review it? IBJ> [IanJ] [E.g., answer before ftf meeting by email whether to endorse IBJ> it] IBJ> [IanJ] DC: Tradition here is to get two reviewers. IBJ> [IanJ] TBL: Who wishes to review? IBJ> [IanJ] PC: I will read it. IBJ> [IanJ] CL: I volunteer to read it. IBJ> [IanJ] Action CL, PC: Read TBL's TLD essay, send comments to www-tag. IBJ> [IanJ] Action TBL: Send pointer to essay to www-tag. I recall on the call TBL saying the document was already public? Besides, there is a relative URI above; with an assumed base of http://www.w3.org giving http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/TLD so I suggest TBL's action be considered closed. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Monday, 3 May 2004 19:22:03 UTC