Unaddress [skwXX] comments (was RE: 5 July Working Draft of Archi tecture Document available)

Ian,

Thank you for organising this publication.

> More details:
> 
>  a) Stuart's comments: I believe I took into account his
>     (usefully) numbered comments except the following: 2, 3¸
>     6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 20, 21, 26, 28, 35, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43,
>     44, 45, 48, 49.
> 
>     Also: I made some changes for 36 but that GPN needs more
>     attention.
> 
>     I observe that two main themes emerge from SW's untreated
>     comments:
> 
>      a) "Identify": Do all instances mean pathayes:c or
>         pathayes:d or both? Is it a critical problem?
> 
>      b) "Ownership" concept needs more precision.

With respect to my numbered comments [5] that you left unaddressed, I have
just organised those by theme which may help us discuss them further.

Summary of themes in [skwXX] comments not addressed in  5 July WD
  C/D Sense of Identity etc.: 2, 3, 6, 7¸ 10, 28, 35, 48, 49
  URI/Resource Ownership: 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,
  Other: 9 (facecious),
  Language of Language: 14
  APIs and Protocols: 20
  Prior agreement on terms and meaning: 21
  URI Mechanism (editorial): 26,
  Indirect Identification, local policy: 38,

Thanks,

Stuart
--
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/0037