- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:44:01 -0600
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 14:18, Norman Walsh wrote: > Before the winter break (Happy New Year!), I took an action to revise > the "Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content" > Finding. The editorial draft of my revisions is available now at > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html Umm... "This finding was accepted by the TAG at its 22 July 2002 teleconference." Wow, we resolved issue timeMachine-42? ;-) Seriously... be careful with the status section stuff, please. > I've added some explicit references to C14N, DSig, and other specs > that have experienced difficulties with QNames in content. > > I've also made the "Architectural Statement" at the end significantly > more assertive. Several folks expressed concern that I was not making > a strong enough case in the conclusion. > > Be seeing you, > norm -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:46:10 UTC