Re: Rough sketch for an I-D (a successor of RFC 3023)

On Oct 31, 2003, at 4:46 AM, MURATA Makoto wrote:

> However, I still would like to know if the TAG (or W3C in general) is 
> willing
> to propose fragment identifiers as part of the next version of the XML 
> media
> types RFCs.

I assume by "next version" you mean the one after this thing we're 
currently working on?

Speaking personally for myself, I don't see the need for fragment 
identifiers for */xml since the various */*+xml define their own 
fragids usually and I don't see much */xml being served.  But of others 
see the need I won't make a big noise. -Tim