W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Rough sketch for an I-D (a successor of RFC 3023)

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 07:51:27 -0800
Message-Id: <161EB63A-0BBA-11D8-8104-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
To: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>

On Oct 31, 2003, at 4:46 AM, MURATA Makoto wrote:

> However, I still would like to know if the TAG (or W3C in general) is 
> willing
> to propose fragment identifiers as part of the next version of the XML 
> media
> types RFCs.

I assume by "next version" you mean the one after this thing we're 
currently working on?

Speaking personally for myself, I don't see the need for fragment 
identifiers for */xml since the various */*+xml define their own 
fragids usually and I don't see much */xml being served.  But of others 
see the need I won't make a big noise. -Tim
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 10:52:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:40 UTC