W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2003

Re: [Minutes] 20 Oct 2003 TAG teleconf (abstractComponentRefs-37, URI Syntax, RFC 3023)

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:20:53 -0500
To: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, fallside@us.ibm.com
Message-ID: <OF28BD3FD0.55F543BF-ON85256DCA.000FD195@lotus.com>

I am traveling this week and do not have the network access, the time, or 
quite possibly the expertise to follow all the subtleties and implications 
of this thread.  I do notice the proposal to supercede RFC 3023, which as 
I think you're aware is referenced by SOAP Part 2 and the associated 
application/soap+xml media type.  Perhaps one of you might send a note to 
distApp giving the protocols WG a heads up regarding what's being 
considered and why?  I could try this evening, but I'm unlikely to give a 
good explanation.  Many thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
10/24/2003 06:48 AM

 
        To:     Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
        cc:     www-tag@w3.org, (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        Re: [Minutes] 20 Oct 2003 TAG teleconf (abstractComponentRefs-37, URI 
Syntax, RFC 3023)




> As a first cut though it would do what you said above:
> 
> - deprecate text/xml.
> - the optianal charset parameter of application/xml
>   (and non-text/*+xml) is recommended if and
>   only if the value is correct.

Then, everybody will be happy. I would propose to publish an 
RFC that *obsoletes* RFC 3023.  Such an RFC is better than an update RFC, 
since other things have to be changed (e.g., we have to mention XML 1.1).
I volunteer to write such an RFC together with somebody from W3C.

Cheers,


-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Received on Monday, 27 October 2003 00:26:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:22 GMT