Re: [Minutes] 20 Oct 2003 TAG teleconf (abstractComponentRefs-37, URI Syntax, RFC 3023)

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 11:37:16AM +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> is not a valid URL -- we're talking about the fragment identifier
> here, there's no interaction with absolutising relative URIs as far as
> I know.

Oops, right.  I had just been looking at some XPath URIs, and forgot
this was about XPointer; e.g.

http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/?q=//xhtml:cite[contains(.,'Udell')]

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Received on Saturday, 25 October 2003 14:33:15 UTC