W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Bristol action: Rewrite the last paragraph of 4.9.2

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:30:15 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-id: <87llrbaml4.fsf@nwalsh.com>

Hash: SHA1

/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> was heard to say:
|>Suggested replacement:
|>Applications that rely on DTD processing must impose additional
|>constraints on the use of namespaces. DTDs perform validation based on
|>the lexical form of the element and attribute names in the document.
|>This makes prefixes semantically significant in ways that are
|>anticipated by [XMLNS]. As other schema technologies become widely
|>deployed, this drawback will diminish in significance.
| It might be useful to indicate that it is possible to use parameter
| entity references to avoid the problem of fixed prefixes when using
| DTDs.

That only addresses one part of the problem (it allows any prefix for
a given document, but does not allow different prefixes in different
parts of the same document) and seems too much of a technical detail
for the webarch doc to me.

                                        Be seeing you,

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Those who in their youth did not live in
XML Standards Architect | self-harmony, and who did not gain the true
Web Tech. and Standards | treasures of life, are later like long-legged
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | old herons standing sadly by a lake without
                        | fish.--The Dhammapada
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

Received on Thursday, 23 October 2003 13:30:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:40 UTC