W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Arch Doc: 23 June 2003 Editor's Draft (equivalence -> coreference)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 25 Jun 2003 20:05:30 -0500
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1056589529.24285.607.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 18:35, Tim Bray wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Let's do change "equivalence" to "coreference".
> 
> I'm not comfortable with that at all.  In particular, rfc2396bis now 
> talks entirely in terms of equivalence, and in section 6.1 I think makes 
> the context pretty clear.  So it's over to Dan: if "equivalence" is a 
> show-stopper for you, then publication is on hold until we can hash this 
> out as a group.

No, it's not a showstopper, just my preference.

I can see that not everybody prefers it. I'll have
to firm up my argument if I want to push it further.

> 
> rfc3296bis: http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:04:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:17 GMT