W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2003

RE: RDDL again

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:55:35 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F04A07578@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>

> RFC2396 is a normative reference *for rddl*. I'd expect that to be
> written:
> 
> <> <http://www.rddl.org/purposes#normative-reference> 
> <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt> .
>  
> I thought we discussed this in Hawaii, but the record
> (http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0505-agenda)
> doesn't include the picture we drew on the flip-chart. :-{

I think it was November, Boston and a rendition of the diagram from the flip
chart is at [1,2]


Stuart
--
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/11/18-tag-summary#RDDL
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/11/lunch-graph.png
Received on Monday, 9 June 2003 14:56:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:38 UTC