W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2003

Re: On subsetting XML...

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:11:38 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <87bs2f24lx.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> was heard to say:
| But its also true that the need for a ID solution becomes more acute
| when a subsetted XML (that has no internal or external DTD subset) is
| considered.

You are absolutely correct.

But I still want to keep them separate. Dave Orchard pushed back on
the position I posted because (or at least in part because, or at
least I think it was because) it didn't address xml:id. He's right.
And that's the way I think it should stay.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Nothing will ever be attempted, if all
XML Standards Architect | possible objections must be first
Web Tech. and Standards | overcome.--Dr. Johnson
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+KB0qOyltUcwYWjsRAla0AKCgz8Bi9leU9VMRHEh5CRenSBw3TwCfcMbV
omZX7aksshh3QGsM4I5+4aw=
=cF7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 10:12:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:15 GMT