- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:15:50 +0100
- To: www-tag@w3.org, "Arnaud Le Hors" <lehors@us.ibm.com>
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, 12:59:17 AM, Arnaud wrote: ALH> Just a small remark: Although there may be advantages to get this specified ALH> in the XML spec and have the parsers handle this at the lower level, what ALH> solution is chosen and what document it is specified in need not to be tied ALH> together. So: >> - requires a (small) change to XML spec and XML parsers ALH> isn't necessarily true. I agree. xml:base is not in the XML spec, and adds to the xml namespace. However there have been proposals that alladditions to the xml namespace get rolled into the xml spec at the next revision and this does seem to make sense to me. Although it would still require a change to XML parsers, albeit a small one. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2003 10:15:53 UTC