On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, 7:48:14 PM, Tim wrote: TB> Chris Lilley wrote: TB> Very good and useful Chris, thank you. Thanks. It discharges my action item, and starts what might be a fruitful discussion. >> Most (but not all) attributes called id are of type ID. Most (but not >> all) attributes of type ID are called id. TB> 1. What's the existence proof of a deployed vocabulary that has an TB> attribute named "id" which is not an ID? I did not have a particular one in mind, although i suspect that the tag names would not be in English and would be in a language using the latin alphabet were the word "id" meant something. TB> 2. What's the existence proof of a deployed vocabulary that has an ID TB> attribute that's not named "id"? RDF/XML - its called ID. Tell me you were not suggesting case insensitivity, please .... TB> Just curious, I suspect they probably exist, just haven't seen them. -Tim -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Tuesday, 7 January 2003 15:28:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:45 GMT