Re: Options for dealing with IDs

Chris Lilley wrote:

Very good and useful Chris, thank you.

> Most (but not all) attributes called id are of type ID. Most (but not
> all) attributes of type ID are called id. 

1. What's the existence proof of a deployed vocabulary that has an 
attribute named "id" which is not an ID?
2. What's the existence proof of a deployed vocabulary that has an ID 
attribute that's not named "id"?

Just curious, I suspect they probably exist, just haven't seen them. -Tim

Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2003 13:48:44 UTC