W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2003

RE: New URI scheme talk in RSS-land

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:09:06 -0800
Message-ID: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D5178B@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "www-tag @ w3. org" <www-tag@w3.org>

If we have a MIME type that always involves invoking a separate application when a user clicks on a feed how does one perform HTTP GETs on the feed to view the XML content in their browser then? So does this mean servers have to use separate MIME types for the same file or that the assumption is that no one will ever want to click on a feed and see the actual content in their web browser? Both seem like gross hacks to me. 
 
Then again I don't have the "HTTP URIs can solve every problem" religion so this may just be a problem with me. 
 
-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the Earth, minus 40% inheritance tax. 

________________________________

From: www-tag-request@w3.org on behalf of Dan Brickley
Sent: Sat 12/6/2003 3:47 AM
To: Tim Bray
Cc: 'www-tag @ w3. org'
Subject: Re: New URI scheme talk in RSS-land



How about making sure the RSS feed URI appears in the mime-typed
representation passed by the browser?
Received on Saturday, 6 December 2003 13:11:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:23 GMT