W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2003

Re: pls mark w3cMediaType-1 pending negotiations with IETF or something

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:57:15 -0600
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
Message-Id: <1070647035.13843.16.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 09:51, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Friday, December 5, 2003, 12:05:52 PM, Graham wrote:
> 
> 
> GK> At 17:30 04/12/03 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >>While it's good that we are agreed, and the
> >>webarch doc is pretty well done with this,
> >>there's still work to do on issue
> >>
> >>http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#w3cMediaType-1
> >>
> >>People still seem to be using
> >>   http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype.html
> >>as guidance, and I haven't figured out whether I believe
> >>that thing or not.
> 
> GK> I wasn't aware of that document, but it looks plausible.
> 
> I am aware of it, uncomfortable with it, and wish the new process
> would move from ID to RFC so we could start using it.

I added a status label to reflect the uncertainty around it.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 5 December 2003 12:57:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:23 GMT