Hey, : True. So if you point was to suggest that the conference registration : form, by virtue of asking for a registrant's "email address" rather : than their "globally unique identifier", defines the context for : interpretation, I'd agree. I just didn't see the example explaining : that point. If it can be fixed, then great, though as I mentioned to : Walden, I'm not sure it can while remaining succinct. It seems to me that the Architecture of the World Wide Web has to make a decision as to whether there is such a thing as indirect identification at the architecture level, and if so formalize what that is. Otherwise, beyond saying "don't do that" about using URI to identify more than one resource, I don't think there is anything to say, and one shouldn't try. Sorry to keep chiming in... WaldenReceived on Monday, 1 December 2003 14:18:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:52:50 GMT