Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> More importantly, it is because the namespaces draft cannot declare them >>> to be different because a normalizer has every right (and in some cases >>> a responsibility) to normalize those URIs before the namespace processor >>> even sees them. >> >> I find this argument hard to follow without a concrete example here. > > Normalization of identifiers is often done by link management systems > to reduce unnecessary duplication of URI trees by sloppy human folks, > since such duplication effects both downstream caches and the valuation > function applied by third-party indexers. It was one of the most common > feature requests for MOMspider. > > I expect that similar normalizers will work on xmlns attributes I'd say anyone running link normalization software on his xmlns's is begging to please get into deep trouble. I understand your nervousness about the fact that the IRI spec isn't final, but I find this argument to be akin to "forbid cissors because people might run with them". -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 05:20:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:57 GMT