W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2003

Re: namespaceDocument-8: possible interaction with Namespaces in XML 1.1

From: Jeremy Dunck <ralinon@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 14:13:34 -0500
To: tbray@textuality.com, LMM@acm.org
Cc: pcotton@microsoft.com, www-tag@w3.org, pgrosso@arbortext.com, roy.fielding@day.com
Message-ID: <BAY1-F33Wy77Tud1j5e00070346@hotmail.com>

Sorry for dupe, Tim.

>From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
>Larry Masinter wrote:
>
>>Let me turn this around: why do you think it's important to stamp
>>out the practice of using "urn" URIs for namespace names?
<snip>
>And I continue to think that permanence is an artifact of publisher's 
>intention and community practice, rather than what comes before the first 
>":".

While I think that having HTTP URIs, which could be dereferenced, is useful, 
one obstacle in the way of HTTP URI permanence is the leasing of domain 
names.  Since a domain I own today might slip out of my ownership, despite 
the best intentions, any namespace I might allocate on that domain is 
suspect.

Do we want to tackle permanent domain ownership, with titles and grants for 
legal transfer?  ;)

It's useful (to me, at least) to note that I could own a domain, but no web 
server at all, and still make legitimate claims to namespaces allocated 
within that domain.

  -Jeremy



_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 15:13:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:17 GMT