On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 10:09:48 PM, Simon wrote: SSL> That's fine - I just wasn't sure what exactly the example was saying, SSL> and if it's a matter of "pointing to an element vs. pointing to a thing" SSL> the drafts discussed at the URL I provided just amplify that we're SSL> pointing at elements in this process. SSL> I think that means I agree with your perspective, unless I've missed yet SSL> another step in the URI dance. I think that means we agree. Scary, isn't it ;-) -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 17:23:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:54 GMT