W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 12:38:11 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <87y99fxyto.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org> was heard to say:
| It would be great to define
|
| <anything xlink:href="..." />
|
| as a simple XLink ...

Assuming you're willing to put a few defaulted attributes on <anything>,
and you don't want additional href attributes, I think you can.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | The First Amendment is often inconvenient.
XML Standards Architect | But that is besides the point. Inconvenience
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | does not absolve the government of its
                        | obligation to tolerate speech.--Justice
                        | Anthony Kennedy, in 91-155
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE9nHJzOyltUcwYWjsRAn76AJ4unMXtlnDwikNJpaHcQQtVd1s6VgCfUtEB
2hmKxxDBP1vMZkNfHSJXt0w=
=vIfN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 12:38:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:12 GMT