RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links

> Paul Prescod
> If RDF 
> clears up its relationship with what Dan Brickley calls "colloquial 
> XML"[1] then I think that it would have a strong case as a 
> replacement 
> for XLink.

FTR: Ron Daniel's note Harvesting RDF Statements from XLinks is here: 

	http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink2rdf/

It's out of date wrt the current RDF canon, but it could be useful as a
strawman.


Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com